Saturday, March 17, 2012

Seller pulls website after racist anti-Obama sticker goes viral

 

Anti-Obama bumper sticker is seen on redalertlive’s website. (©redalertlive/http://bit.ly/yYUSfU)

This year's presidential race is already one of the most ugly and nasty in recent history. But a photo of a racist anti-Obama bumper sticker that has gone viral across social media, ranks as one of the lowest of many low moments. The sticker reads "Don't Re-Nig in 2012" in large white script, with "Stop Repeat Offenders. 

Deal of the Week!

Don't reelect Obama!" in smaller script below. The sticker originated from a site called Stumpy's Stickers, which has since shut down and which also sold several other racist and anti-Obama-themed stickers, including one with hooded Ku Klux Klan figures bearing the phrase "The Original Boyz N The Hood."

 
View Original article here. 

RACIST BITCHES....I Just Put You On Blast!! 



 




Pimpin’ Ain’t Easy… Unless You Have An Android Phone With Pattern Lock


By Vincent Messina (1:58 pm PDT, Mar 14) 

Pimpin’ Ain’t Easy… Unless You Have An Android Phone With Pattern Lock
When we think about security for our mobile devices, we’re usually protecting it from nefarious individuals. Well guess what? It apparently works both ways. In a story straight out of James Brown’s diary, the FBI is having a hard time busting a notorious San Diego pimp thanks to Android’s pattern lock feature.
After numerous arrests and jail time, Dante Dears — founder and head of “Pimpin’ Hoes Daily” (I’m not making this up) — found himself out on parole, shackled with a GPS monitor, and ordered to stay off the streets. He of course learned his lesson and 
gave up
 found craftier ways to run his hoe empire. Giving orders and setting up tricks via a Samsung Android phone, Dante Dears had women dropping off cash in fear of getting mobile bitch slapped.
After hours of surveillance and undercover work, FBI agents confronted Dears with the evidence and he quickly 
fessed up
 denied the allegations stating that the cellphone belonged to his sister. He eventually gave up the phone but being the security conscious pimp that he was, he had it protected with Android’s pattern lock feature — a feature which requires the user to drag a preset pattern across the unlock grid to gain access to the device.
Deal of the Week!

The FBI sent the phone off to the FBI Regional Computer Forensics Lab in Southern California where technicians were defeated by the pattern lock and eventually locked out completely due to too many failed attempts. Since the device now requires Dears’ Google account credentials (which he isn’t giving up), the FBI is looking to Google to help them out. In a new warrant filed with the judge, the FBI asks Google to hand over:
  • The subscriber’s name, address, Social Security number, account login and password
  • “All e-mail and personal contact list information on file for cellular telephone”
  • The times and duration of every webpage visited
  • All text messages sent and received from the phone, including photo and video messages
  • Any e-mail addresses or instant messenger accounts used on the phone
  • “Verbal and/or written instructions for overriding the ‘pattern lock’ installed on the” phone
  • All search terms, Internet history, and GPS data that Google has stored for the phone
There’s been no word from Google regarding the warrant or whether or not they will comply, but if we’ve learned one thing from this crazy ordeal, it’s that Pimpin’ ain’t easy… unless you have an Android phone with pattern lock.
View Original article here. 

FBI....I Just Put You On Blast!! 

Bush league pimp's Android password stumps FBI



File photo of an Android phone screen with a pattern lock (© mikedent/Flickr/http://aka.ms/t2tq3q)

Paroled pimp Dante Dears thought he was being clever when he used his smartphone to run his business, (called Pimpin' Hoes Daily, and yes, we're being serious), while he was under house arrest but ... well, actually he was. 

Gizmodo says that even though the FBI discovered his Android-powered "pimpire" and confiscated his Samsung, they've been completely baffled by the pattern lock he used to secure his data. 



Deal of the Week!


After a regional computer forensics lab was "shut out permanently for excessive login failures", the Feds filed a warrant telling Google to turn over Dears' address book, text messages, search history and, oh yeah, the instructions so they can bypass that pattern lock.


View Original article here.


FBI....I Just Put You On Blast!!

Woman drinks her urine on aptly titled 'Strange Addiction'


Carrie drinking her urine on 'My Strange Addiction' (© TLC)


Meet Carrie, a 53-year-old woman who loves to drink her own urine. Carrie says, "I like warm pee. It's comforting. The first time I drank my urine, I didn't throw up and it wasn't horrible. So I thought, 'You know what? I can do this.'" Kind of like how they figured out they COULD re-create dinosaurs in "Jurassic Park," but they never questioned if they SHOULD. 

Buy.com Monthly Coupon

Also questionable: her habit of using urine to bathe and brush her teeth. Her daughter Cassie is concerned all this pee-guzzling could harm more than her mother's breath and credibility, though the practice drinking your own pee (urophagia) has its loyal adherents. Carrie will drink her urine on camera and muse about its subtle palette on TLC's "Strange Addictions" this week.




 




View Original article here.




CRAZY BITCH....I Just Put You On Blast!!



Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Should district be allowed to demand middle-schooler's Facebook password?

Up against the Wall! Should district be allowed to demand middle-schooler's Facebook password?



Buy.com Monthly Coupon

 Officials at the Minnewaska Area School District -- which is about 125 miles northwest of Minneapolis -- say the ACLU's version of events is "one-sided," and that the school acted to "prevent disruption," according to a statement e-mailed to msnbc.com by Superintendent Gregory Ohl.

"The district is confident that once all the facts come to light, the district's conduct will be found to be reasonable and appropriate," it said.  

When asked if the district has obtained other students’ login information, he responded, “We feel this is not accurate.”

The lawsuit raises the complicated -- and quite unsettled -- legal quandary that balances students' constitutional rights with schools' needs to maintain order and a positive educational environment. For example, can schools punish students who publicly criticize school officials on their own time using social networks?

Federal district courts have handed down contradictory decisions on that issue. Facing a chance to settle the matter, the U.S. Supreme Court in January declined to hear three cases on the issue.
But private social media criticism, intended only for a limited audience behind a password or a privacy wall, raises a different legal issue, said Teresa Nelson, a lawyer for the ACLU in Minnesota.
  
"The notion that it was a search of her private Facebook content ... the Fourth Amendment applies," she said.  "The government has to have a really good reason to do that kind of search," and would need a court order in most cases, she said.

Monitor 'was mean to me'
According to the ACLU's version of events, the girl had moved and entered a new school as a 6th-grade student in the fall of 2010. In early 2011, she felt targeted by a school monitor and posted an update to her friends-only Facebook wall saying she "hated" the monitor because "she was mean to me," using her own computer and while off campus.

Soon after, she was called into the principal's office -- he had obtained a screen shot of the post -- and given detention.

The student subsequently posted another update to her page related to the incident: "I want to know who the f%$# told on me," the complaint says. Again, she was called to the principal's office, and this time was suspended for "insubordination" and banned from a class ski trip.

In March, the student had a second run-in with school authorities.  The parent of another student had complained that the girl was talking about sex with that student.  The 12-year-old was called out of class by a school counselor and eventually brought into a room with several school officials and the sheriff's deputy, where the password demands began.

The ACLU claims that the school never asked the girl's parents for permission to examine her private Facebook space. The school district doesn't dispute that it obtained the girl's password, but does say it had parental permission.

"Any viewing of (the student's) Facebook account was done with the express consent of her parents," it said in the statement to msnbc.com.
GoDaddy.com, LLC.

In the First Amendment fight over online criticism related to school, districts and parents are relying on legal interpretations of an outdated 1969 Supreme Court decision knows as “Tinker,” which gives students wide latitude to criticize.  That decision famously gave us the phrase, "Students don't shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates."  The opinion offers little guidance about rights on the other side of a firewall or a Facebook password, however.

The Tinker case basically found that students can say what they want as long as the speech doesn't cause a disruption at school.  But can a school's ability to punish students extend to activity conducted entirely off school grounds?

Dozens of cases over the last decade have failed to hash out the online version of this debate.  In one, a Pennsylvania student who was suspended for making a MySpace page that mocked a principal was granted a reprieve because the U.S. Court of Appeals found it wasn't disruptive. In another, a West Virginia student's suspension was upheld after she created a MySpace page where students were encouraged to discuss if a fellow classmate had herpes.


Legal confusionEven though the National School Boards Association asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear appeals on these two cases in an attempt to break what seems like a legal tie, the nation's top court demurred, leaving behind a lot of legal confusion.

"Things are complicated," said the ACLU’s Nelson. "Kids have been criticizing school officials since there have been school officials. ... If kids had been venting about teachers at McDonald's no one would care."

One important distinction noted by Nelson: While she believes demands for a student's Facebook password were a clear Fourth Amendment violation, there's no constitutional issue raised by a school official learning about a private communication that's volunteered by another student. In other words, students' private Facebook chatter is only as private as the participants make it.

The ACLU of Minnesota offers a rights handbook to students who use social media. While it's specificallyapplicable only to Minnesota law, its principles are universal.

The pamphlet notes that while school officials in most cases cannot force students to reveal their Facebook login information, officials can search for evidence of violations "if they have reasonable individualized suspicion" about an ongoing violation of school rules.

And while free speech rights may prevent schools from banning students from classes because of non-disruptive but critical Facebook posts, those legal protections do not extend to extracurricular activities. In other words, football players and math club members can be kicked off their squads for anything a school official deems against policy.

It's important to note that while Facebook's terms of service say members cannot give out their passwords or otherwise allow others to view private areas of their accounts. But those same terms say members must be 13 years old to join.

View Original article here.


MINNEWASKA AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT....I Just Put You On Blast!!

Clicksor Ads are Malvertising

Eliminating Clicksor Ads

Article by Kevin Tracy

If you’ve visited the site in the last couple of weeks, you probably noticed some flash-based ads at the bottom of the screen.  They’d be banners that would appear for a few seconds and then offer a “Close” link at the top-right.  These ads would sometimes take the form of square and vertical banner ads, too.  Rarely, even a video would play.  These ads were from a company called Clicksor.  On the advice of a friend who was also experimenting with Clicksor, I added Clicksor to my Google Adsense ads.  Although it was slightly against my better judgement to display upwards of four ads on a page, I went along with it.

This morning, I decided to eliminate the Clicksor ads.  My fellow blogger and I began to research Clicksor a bit more the past few days and decided we didn’t like their business practices.  They hide information about their pay-out methods (and how they can evade paying web-publishers) and their method of screening advertisers deserves scrutiny, too.  We’ve had sporadic e-mails from readers claiming the Clicksor ads were offering pornography and some even triggered red-alerts from Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox over trojan-horses and other forms of malware.  I’ve also noticed advertisements for online gambling, an activity that is illegal in the State of Indiana.

Although my traffic has remained fairly steady, my friend believes his has dropped about 10% over the last month due to the pesky nature and content of Clicksor’s pop-over flash ads.

I sincerely apologize if this has caused any problems for my readers.  The malware warnings were incredibly rare, and likely were only triggered because the ad was hosted on a website known to contain dangerous elements.  Likewise, only one of my readers reported seeing a pornographic ad and I only saw an online gambling ad once on this site.  I also run a website that discusses political and social issues.  My counterpart’s blog focuses on celebrity gossip, so there were several more problems regarding the latter problems on his site.

Deal of the Week!

For what it’s worth, Clicksor asks if you have adult content on your website AND whether or not you want adult content to be featured in ads that appear on your website.  I answered “No” to both questions.  This plus the simple fact that they aren’t screening advertisers for end-user safety led me to say their screening method deserves scrutiny.

In the meantime, I will continue to run Google ads; which have been proven safe; on this site and satellite websites in the KTracy.com network.

View Original article here.



Clicksor....I Just Put You On Blast!!

Monday, March 12, 2012

Umm, WTF is wrong with you people?


No comment!

extremebodymodlegspike






NASTY MF....I Just Put You On Blast!!

Sunday, March 11, 2012

Kim Kardashian and Reggie Bush Considering Reconciliation



Kim Kardashian and Reggie Bush Considering Reconciliation


Kim Kardashian and Reggie Bush are reportedly considering getting back together despite Reggie recently said he didn’t want to be with her.

The couple broke up first in 2010 after being together for three years. The split was caused by rumors that Reggie Bush was cheating on her with several models.

Another reported cause of the fracture in their relationship is the obsession of Kim with her career which triggered them to be apart. Since then, however, they have considered several times getting back together.

Despite the facts, Kim  dated a couple of ballers and got married to Kris Humphries last year, the couple thinks they could never stop loving each other. I wonder?



Buy.com Monthly Coupon

 
Therefore, they are now trying to work out their relationship by reconciling. What do you think of the two? Should Reggie Bush get back with Kim or should he think again?





View Original article here.


KIM KARDASHIAN....I Just Put You On Blast!!

Wall Street Bankers Use Seamless To Feast On FREE Lobster, Steak, And Beer

BY Austin Carr |

The online service has simplified ordering out for all kinds of people, but corporate giants like Morgan Stanley make up a significant portion of Seamless's customer base. For some bankers who've learned how to game the web system, everything on the menu--and off--is gratis.




A former Morgan Stanley banker recently described his weekend food-ordering ritual at the height of the recession. While pulling Saturday hours, for example, he'd log onto the bank's account on Seamless, the online food-ordering service, and redeem his meal allowance--plus a few allowances from phantom coworkers who weren't actually in the office, allowing him to eat well above his pay grade. Sure, someone could have cross-checked actual office attendence with the online orders, but is such effort worth the investment bank's time?
"If people weren't around, it was totally acceptable to take their allowance, and pool it together when you ordered," the banker recalls. "Almost every weekend I was at the office, I'd have a $90 dinner of steak, lobster, mac & cheese, and calamari."
Until several years ago, corporate giants like Morgan Stanley made up roughly 85% of Seamless's customer base. That figure has now tipped in favor of individual consumers, but enterprise clients still represent a significant (and growing) part of the New York-based company's revenue--companies offer Seamless as a benefit to those who typically work long or late hours. But for employees of these roughly 3,500 corporate Seamless customers, the benefit represents a huge opportunity to game the system. And no one has worked the system for financial gain better than Wall Street hustlers.
"Abuse of the system was rampant," recalls another former Morgan Stanley staffer. "I added up how much I ordered in my first year: It was more than $3,000 of food."
Here's how it works.

Typically, junior professionals are allotted about $25 per meal at the office. But there are tricks to leverage this cash on Seamless. If employees want to order dinner, for example, they have to stay until 8 p.m. "But you could still order for a 7 p.m. delivery at 6 p.m., then call the restaurant directly and tell them to bring it right away," one employee says. "So I'd finish work around 6:30 p.m., hit the company gym, and then grab my sushi--spicy tuna rolls--on the way out."

Buy.com Monthly Coupon


A Seamless Scam

How Gordon Gekko Orders On Seamless
1// Top Seamless Fiend
According to Seamless' statistics, the highest ordering corporate user placed more than 2,600 orders in 2011, or more than 7 meals per day.
2// Top Cuisine By Industry Employees
Investment Bankers: Sushi;
Educators: Pizza
3// Top Ordering Patterns
Corporate dinner-orders in New York's Financial District peak at 8 p.m. In Midtown, corporate orders peak at 7 p.m. Corporate dinner-orders are higher, on average, from 4-5 p.m. and lower between 8 p.m. and 9 p.m.
Ordering groceries on Seamless was--and likely still is--another practice. (Representatives at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have not responded to requests for comment.) One employee, who lived by Morgan Stanley's Midtown offices, would even remote into her office computer from her apartment, place an order on Seamless, and then call the restaurant and change the delivery address to her apartment. The lobster-loving Morgan Stanley banker's take on that old switcheroo? "Classic."

Another trick: Since employees aren't allowed to order beer or alcohol on the system, it's not uncommon to pool money together, place a large order for random items, then call the store and request that they bring beer instead.

"We definitely get a lot of random orders," says Seamless CEO Jonathan Zabusky. "Once in a while, I'll sit on the customer-care desk, just to get a feel on the pulse of what's going on. You see these orders come through, and you're like, 'Why are 20 rolls of toilet paper going to 200 Vesey Street [the World Financial Center]? What the hell?'"

One former employee at Morgan Stanley said he wasn't sure how pervasive the "switch-for-beer order" was at the investment bank, but said he personally pulled the move several times. "Wow, I feel so lame now because when I'd order from Seamless, I'd just get dinner," says one former Goldman Sachs employee. "I never heard of anyone else pulling a fast one [like that], but that doesn't mean it never happened."

The daily Seamless stipend is considered sacred for employees, and any abuse of the system appears generally overlooked by higher-ups. When Lehman Brothers went under, for instance, Morgan Stanley lowered the Seamless limit from $30 to $25, much to the anger of workers. "People went nuts," recalls a former employee. "Every so often there were these fireside chats with [Morgan Stanley CEO] John Mack 'Da Knife' and a collection of analysts. One of the women on the call asked Mack to raise the limit to $30 again. Mack, not really having paid much attention to expenses, was surprised to hear it had been reduced. Concerned, he asked her why she needed $30 instead of just $25. She said that with the new reduction, 'I can't order my Perrier anymore.'" The next day, as legend has it, there was an entire case of Perrier on her desk--courtesy of John Mack. "What a baller," an employee says.

Deal of the Week!


Zabusky is sure abuse exists on Seamless, but says it's not likely that widespread. "I think it's pretty funny," the Seamless chief chuckles. "I mean, I know it probably frustrates a CFO at Goldman, who is giving these guys $25 to order while they work on deals, and they're ordering toilet paper and jars of mayonnaise and all this other stuff. But in the overall scope, it's probably pretty small."

Small as the abuses might be in terms of Seamless's bottom line, there's no doubt it has a big impact on the morale of employees, who seem to take pride in manipulating money one way or another. According to Seamless's statistics, for example, the highest ordering corporate user placed more than 2,600 orders in 2011.

"There's nothing grosser or more magnificent than eating $25 of delivered Taco Bell under the fluorescent, sober lights of an office building," says one employee. "Do you have any idea how much baja sauce you can get for that money?"


View Original article here.


WALL STREET BANKERS....I Just Put You On Blast!!

Another parent forgets their kid at Chuck E. Cheese




One more and it's a trend. For the second time in a week, a child has been left behind at Chuck E. Cheese. Earlier this week, separated parents in Maryland each thought the other had taken three-year-old daughter Harmony home and didn't realize she was still at the restaurant-slash-fun time center until she showed up on the evening news.

Sale! $7.99 .COM Domains from GoDaddy.com 468x60


And now, a mother of 10 kids is under investigation for forgetting her five-year-old at a Chuck E. Cheese in Pearland, Texas, after the child's own birthday party. The mother was described as "very upset," but her daughter remains under the custody of child protective services.


View Original article here.


FORGETFUL PARENTS....I Just Put You On Blast!!

Friday, March 9, 2012

Waiter gets fired for posting pic of Peyton Manning’s generous tip

Peyton Manning, formerly of the Indianapolis Colts (© Marcio Sanchez/AP)

​A waiter at a restaurant in Raleigh, N.C., has something in common with Peyton Manning: They're both currently out of work. The waiter, identified on the receipt as Jon, posted a picture of a receipt that shows an awesomely generous tip left by Manning at the Angus Barn. You can view the actual receipt HERE.

GoDaddy.com, LLC.

It turns out the waiter violated company policy, and owner and operator Van Eure has fired him, according to the Triangle Business Journal. The restaurant said it often serves celebrities, and it has a strict policy that their private dining experiences stay private. The receipt showed Manning had added an additional $200 tip to the $739 bill, which already included an 18 percent gratuity.



View Original article here.


ANGUS BARN....I Just Put You On Blast!!

Sunday, March 4, 2012

Yapping it up


Tommy Bahama Lawn chair...$68


Cell phone...$99 w new 2 year contract



Sun glasses...$95 @ Sunglass Hut



Yapping it up NOT paying attention while some stranger walks off w/ your kid....

Priceless!!!!!



Lady...I JUST PUT YOU ON BLAST!!!!

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Web Hosting Coupons